Opinion
OCTOBER 2, 2000
99-8943 OKORO v. SCIBANA, WARDEN. C.A. 6th Cir. Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ 530 U.S. 1227] denied.
99-9052 SAMUEL v. NATHAN'S FAMOUS OPERATING CORP. C.A.2d Cir. Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ 529 U.S. 1128] denied.
99-9144 DeNARDO v. CUNNINGHAM ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ 530 U.S. 1241] denied.
99-9517 KARIM-PANAHI v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. C.A. 9th Cir. Motion of petitioners for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ 530 U.S. 1241] denied.
99-9912 NEIL v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO. ET AL. App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist.;
99-9941 ABDALLAH v. PILEGGI ET AL. C.A. Fed. Cir.;
99-9995 BAUTISTA RIVERA v. GREENE. Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist.;
99-10132 LICHTER v. FLORIDA. C.A. 11th Cir.;
00-5120 MORTON v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE. C.A. Fed. Cir.;
00-5313 SIMPSON v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. C.A. 11th Cir.;
00-5325 COTTON v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir.;
00-5330 FULLER v. BARRETT ET AL. C.A. 4th Cir.; and
00-5415 MURRAY v. UNITED STATES. C.A. Armed Forces. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioners are allowed until October 23, 2000, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit petitions in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
99-10221 GRIER ET AL. v. HOOD, WARDEN. C.A. 9th Cir. Motion of petitioners to expedite consideration of petition for writ of certiorari denied.
99-10045 IN RE PERRY. C.A. 9th Cir. Petition for writ of common-law certiorari denied.