From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mirto v. City of Waterbury

Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Waterbury
Apr 21, 1994
1994 Ct. Sup. 4121 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1994)

Opinion

No. 114811

April 21, 1994


MEMORANDUM OF DECISION


Practice Book 282 gives the court the discretion to strike a case from the jury list if the case is not properly claimed to a jury.

In a jury trial, the court decides all issues of law, and the jury decides only factual issues. General Statutes 52-216; Practice Book 306. In this case, the contested issue appears to be the legal effect of a contract entered into between the former Mayor of Waterbury without approval of the Board of Aldermen and the plaintiff. There appears to be no factual issue in dispute.

The court may strike a case from a jury docket when there is no prejudice to the other party. Peabody International v. Coordination Technology, Inc., 6 Conn. L. Rptr. 437, 442 (May 18, 1992, Nigro, J.) (court enforced jury waiver clause in lease three years after claim to jury list). There is no prejudice to the defendant in striking the case from the jury list as there are no issues of contested fact to submit to a jury.

The case cited by the defendant, Carqiulo v. Delsole, 769 F.2d 77 (1985), is distinguishable as both parties in that case wanted a jury trial.

Accordingly, in the absence of a factual dispute, the court will strike the case from the jury list upon the plaintiff's withdrawal of his claim for jury trial.

McDONALD, J.


Summaries of

Mirto v. City of Waterbury

Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Waterbury
Apr 21, 1994
1994 Ct. Sup. 4121 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1994)
Case details for

Mirto v. City of Waterbury

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY MIRTO v. CITY OF WATERBURY

Court:Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Waterbury

Date published: Apr 21, 1994

Citations

1994 Ct. Sup. 4121 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1994)
9 CSCR 519