From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miro v. Branford House, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 6, 1991
174 A.D.2d 363 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

June 6, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lewis Friedman, J.).


The IAS court properly exercised its discretion in severing the third-party medical malpractice action from the main action, a personal injury action seeking damages for conscious pain and suffering and wrongful death stemming from the alleged negligence of defendants/third-party plaintiffs, among others, whose building water system was claimed to have scalded the decedent, contributing to her death 17 days thereafter. The commencement of the third-party action on the eve of trial of the main action, which was commenced more than 3 1/2 years earlier, would inevitably cause plaintiff prejudice if trial were to be further delayed in order to convene a medical malpractice panel and to complete discovery in the subsidiary malpractice action (Cortez v New York City Hous. Auth., 163 A.D.2d 13).

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Kassal and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

Miro v. Branford House, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 6, 1991
174 A.D.2d 363 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Miro v. Branford House, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:LAVINA B. MIRO, as Administratrix of the Estate of BERNICE BOWIE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 6, 1991

Citations

174 A.D.2d 363 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
570 N.Y.S.2d 570

Citing Cases

Wavertree Corp. v. Bellet Constr. Co.

Although future settlement conferences between plaintiff and defendant are scheduled, defendant's belated…

Stewart v. Bogopa-Junction, Inc.

These circumstances (see Freeland v New York Communications Ctr. Assocs., 193 AD2d 511; Miro v Branford…