From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miressi v. Funicello

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 7, 1950
277 App. Div. 931 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)

Opinion

July 7, 1950.

Appeal from City Court of New Rochelle.


On appeal, the said order was affirmed by the County Court, Westchester County. Order of the County Court, Westchester County, modified on the law by striking out everything following the words "be and the same is" and in place thereof inserting a provision denying the tenants' motion for summary judgment. As thus modified, the order is unanimously affirmed, without costs. Material allegations of the petition having been denied by the tenants' answer, it was incumbent upon the landlord to establish them by evidence upon a trial before being entitled to a final order. ( Philip Realty Constr. Co. v. Chubin, 135 App. Div. 766; Civ. Prac. Act, § 1428.) It has been correctly held that the first and third separate defenses set forth in the tenants' answer are insufficient in law. The matters raised by the second separate defense can be proved under the denial of the allegation of good faith. Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur; Carswell, Acting P.J., and Johnston, J., concur on the further ground that rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice does not apply to summary proceedings. ( 905 West End Ave. Corp. v. Peers, 118 Misc. 754.)


Summaries of

Miressi v. Funicello

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 7, 1950
277 App. Div. 931 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)
Case details for

Miressi v. Funicello

Case Details

Full title:GIACCIANO MIRESSI, Respondent, v. ALEXANDER B. FUNICELLO et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 7, 1950

Citations

277 App. Div. 931 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)

Citing Cases

Trustees of Freeholders v. De Angelis

Inasmuch as no material issue of fact was raised by the precept, petition, and answer, the granting of the…