Opinion
NO. 14-18-00916-CR NO. 14-18-00917-CR
07-16-2019
OSCAR MIRELES, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 187th District Court Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court Cause Nos. 2016CR3845 & 2016CR6142
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant appeals his convictions for aggravated assault and possession of a controlled substance. Appellant's appointed counsel filed briefs in which he concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The briefs meet the requirement of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811-13 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
Copies of counsel's briefs were delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). At appellant's request, the record was provided to him. On April 12, 2019 and April 18, 2019, appellant filed pro se responses to counsel's briefs.
We have carefully reviewed the record, counsel's briefs, and appellant's responses, and agree the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record. A discussion of the briefs would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state. We are not to address the merits of each claim raised in an Anders brief or a pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for review. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827-28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
Accordingly, the judgments of the trial court are affirmed.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Hassan.
Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).