From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mire v. Onxley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Sep 18, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17-CV-620 (W.D. La. Sep. 18, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17-CV-620

09-18-2017

JADE E. MIRE v. CODY CHARLES ONXLEY, ET AL.


MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAY

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation (Rec. Doc. 10) of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, after an independent review of the record, a de novo determination of the issues, noting the absence of any objections, and determining that the findings are correct under applicable law,

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Remand (Rec. Doc. 5) is GRANTED. The case is remanded to the 14th Judicial District Court, Parish of Calcasieu, State of Louisiana.

Alexandria, Louisiana, this 18th day of September, 2017.

/s/_________

DEE D. DRELL, CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Mire v. Onxley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Sep 18, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17-CV-620 (W.D. La. Sep. 18, 2017)
Case details for

Mire v. Onxley

Case Details

Full title:JADE E. MIRE v. CODY CHARLES ONXLEY, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION

Date published: Sep 18, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17-CV-620 (W.D. La. Sep. 18, 2017)

Citing Cases

Palmeira v. Cit Bank, N.A.

Other courts finding that consent must be filed within the 30-day removal period have additionally noted that…