From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miranda v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 20, 1988
530 So. 2d 1103 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. 87-797.

September 20, 1988.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Alfonso C. Sepe, J.

John H. Lipinski and Maria Brea-Lipinski, Miami, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Nancy C. Wear, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HUBBART, NESBITT, and JORGENSON, JJ.


As in Velunza v. State, 504 So.2d 780 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), we conclude that the evidence of the appellant's participation in the sale of cocaine to undercover police supports his conviction of trafficking. Nonetheless, there is no proof of an express or implied agreement to commit the offense and his conviction of conspiracy to traffic must be reversed. See Velunza, 504 So.2d at 782; see also Voto v. State, 509 So.2d 1291, 1293 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.


Summaries of

Miranda v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 20, 1988
530 So. 2d 1103 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

Miranda v. State

Case Details

Full title:JULIAN MIRANDA, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Sep 20, 1988

Citations

530 So. 2d 1103 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)