From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miranda v. Lynch

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Aug 3, 2016
No. 14-71949 (9th Cir. Aug. 3, 2016)

Opinion

No. 14-71949

08-03-2016

JOSE LUIS VILLELA MIRANDA, Petitioner, v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

Agency No. A074-824-630 MEMORANDUM On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Jose Luis Villela Miranda, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the BIA's denial of a motion to reopen. Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion denying Villela Miranda's motion to reopen as untimely, where it was filed more than sixteen years after the agency's final decision, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and Villela Miranda did not establish changed circumstances in Guatemala to overcome the time limitation for a motion to reopen, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 987-91 (evidence must be "qualitatively different" to warrant reopening).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.


Summaries of

Miranda v. Lynch

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Aug 3, 2016
No. 14-71949 (9th Cir. Aug. 3, 2016)
Case details for

Miranda v. Lynch

Case Details

Full title:JOSE LUIS VILLELA MIRANDA, Petitioner, v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 3, 2016

Citations

No. 14-71949 (9th Cir. Aug. 3, 2016)