From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miranda v. Clark County

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 24, 2002
295 F.3d 1380 (9th Cir. 2002)

Opinion

No. 00-15734.

July 24, 2002.

Douglas J. McCalla, Esq., Heather Noble, Esq., Jackson, WY, JoNell Thomas, Esq., Law Office of J. Thomas, Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Janson F. Stewart, Office of the District Attorney, Thomas Beatty, Gloria J. Sturman, Esq., Edwards, Hale Hansen, Ltd., Las Vegas, NV, Lance Maningo, Esq., Edwards, Hale, Sturman Atkin, Ltd., for Defendants-Appellees.


ORDER


Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Judge Rawlinson was recused.


Summaries of

Miranda v. Clark County

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 24, 2002
295 F.3d 1380 (9th Cir. 2002)
Case details for

Miranda v. Clark County

Case Details

Full title:Roberto Hernandez MIRANDA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jul 24, 2002

Citations

295 F.3d 1380 (9th Cir. 2002)