From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mirand v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 9, 1995
221 A.D.2d 194 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

November 9, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Douglas McKeon, J.).


While General Municipal Law § 3-a provides for an interest rate not in excess of 9%, CPLR 5004 prohibits a lower rate except where authorized by statute ( Carson v New York City Health Hosps. Corp., 178 A.D.2d 265). Thus, there is no merit to defendant's contention that the rate of interest is a discretionary determination that in the instant case should take into account prevailing market rates of interest.

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Wallach, Rubin, Kupferman and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Mirand v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 9, 1995
221 A.D.2d 194 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Mirand v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:VIRNA MIRAND et al., Respondents, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 9, 1995

Citations

221 A.D.2d 194 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
633 N.Y.S.2d 167

Citing Cases

Sony Financial Services v. Multi Video Group, Ltd.

Unless a statutory exception applies which authorizes a lower interest rate, courts enforcing Section 5001 in…

Sassoonian v. City of New York

Rodriguez (supra) explicitly held that the trial court had the discretion to set a lesser interest rate…