From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miralle v. City of Oakland

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 24, 2023
18-cv-06823-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2023)

Opinion

18-cv-06823-HSG

01-24-2023

ANITA MIRALLE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE CITY OF OAKLAND, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

RE: DKT. NO. 136

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court DIRECTS Plaintiff Tina Scott TO SHOW CAUSE why her claim should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute, given counsel's representations that Ms. Scott has not been a participant in this case past her initial election to be a plaintiff, has not provided counsel with contact information or contacted counsel, has not indicated interest in prosecuting her case, and informed another plaintiff that she did not want to participate further in the case. See Dkt. No. 136. All of the other named plaintiffs have settled their claims. Ms. Scott shall file a statement of two pages or less by February 7, 2023.

Ms. Johns is DIRECTED to make best efforts to locate Ms. Scott and inform her of this order to show cause. The Court grants Ms. Johns leave to file the anticipated motion to withdraw, and will consider that motion once it is filed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Miralle v. City of Oakland

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 24, 2023
18-cv-06823-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2023)
Case details for

Miralle v. City of Oakland

Case Details

Full title:ANITA MIRALLE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE CITY OF OAKLAND, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jan 24, 2023

Citations

18-cv-06823-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2023)