From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mirabel v. State Farm Insurance Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 4, 1999
265 A.D.2d 310 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Submitted June 23, 1998

October 4, 1999

In an action to recover the proceeds of an insurance policy, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Alpert, J.).


ORDERED that the order is modified by deleting the provision thereof denying those branches of the motion which were to direct the plaintiff to respond to items 2, 3, and so much of item 16 as seeks production of copies of telephone bills for the plaintiff's 1993 Mercedes Benz automobile from the date of the alleged theft up to and including December 18, 1995, and substituting therefor a provision granting those branches of the motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The information demanded in items 2 and 3 of the defendant's notice for discovery and inspection, i.e., the plaintiff's personal income tax returns and certain business tax returns, are material and relevant (see, CPLR 3101[a]). As to the material demanded in item 16, certain car telephone bills, the plaintiff need only provide the bills from the date of the alleged theft up to and including December 18, 1995.

BRACKEN, J.P., THOMPSON, GOLDSTEIN, and McGINITY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mirabel v. State Farm Insurance Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 4, 1999
265 A.D.2d 310 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Mirabel v. State Farm Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:EVAN J. MIRABEL, respondent, v. STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 4, 1999

Citations

265 A.D.2d 310 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
696 N.Y.S.2d 696