From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mir v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 16, 2002
802 So. 2d 1222 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

Case No. 3D01-1953

Opinion filed January 16, 2002.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Mark King Leban, Judge. Lower Tribunal No. 96-33821b.

Vladimir Mir, in proper person. Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Thomas C. Mielke, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.

Confession of Error


Vladimir Mir appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. The State concedes that defendant-appellant Mir is within the window period for Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla. 2000), and is entitled to be resentenced. Accordingly we reverse the order now under review and remand for resentencing.

We conclude that defendant's claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel are time-barred. We affirm the trial court's order insofar as it denied relief on the claim of ineffective assistance.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for resentencing.


Summaries of

Mir v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 16, 2002
802 So. 2d 1222 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Mir v. State

Case Details

Full title:VLADIMIR MIR, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jan 16, 2002

Citations

802 So. 2d 1222 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)