From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miollis v. Maze Lactic Cultures, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District
Aug 25, 1939
302 Ill. App. 115 (Ill. App. Ct. 1939)

Opinion

Gen. No. 9,405. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed August 25, 1939. Rehearing stricken November 29, 1939.

COURTS, § 88jurisdiction after term. Where court dismissed complaint for want of jurisdiction of all defendants, after each defendant had moved to strike the complaint because it did not state a cause of action nor a joint cause of action against any defendant, such dismissal was erroneous, but where motion to vacate the order of dismissal was made more than 30 days after the order was entered, after term had expired, the court did not have jurisdiction to vacate that order.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from Circuit Court of McHenry county; Hon. WILLIAM L. PIERCE, presiding. Affirmed. Heard in this court at May term, 1939; opinion filed August 25, 1939; rehearing stricken November 29, 1939.

Thomas Hart Fisher, for appellant;

Willard C. Walters, of counsel; Schuyler Hennessy, for appellees; William C. Graves, Henry E. Jacobs and Martin Burns, of counsel.


"Not to be published in full."


Summaries of

Miollis v. Maze Lactic Cultures, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District
Aug 25, 1939
302 Ill. App. 115 (Ill. App. Ct. 1939)
Case details for

Miollis v. Maze Lactic Cultures, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Raymond Miollis, Appellant, v. Maze Lactic Cultures, Inc. et al.…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District

Date published: Aug 25, 1939

Citations

302 Ill. App. 115 (Ill. App. Ct. 1939)
23 N.E.2d 582

Citing Cases

Sovereign v. Sovereign

Further than that, however, we do not go. If the defendant asks other relief, which can be granted only upon…