From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mintz v. Mintz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 10, 1999
261 A.D.2d 455 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

May 10, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kohn, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant's motion to disqualify the plaintiff's attorney ( see generally, Olmoz v. Town of Fishkill, 258 A.D.2d 447; Juergens v. Schanman, 182 A.D.2d 740).

O'Brien, J. P., Ritter, Joy, Altman and Smith, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mintz v. Mintz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 10, 1999
261 A.D.2d 455 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Mintz v. Mintz

Case Details

Full title:LISA MINTZ, Respondent, v. STEVEN G. MINTZ, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 10, 1999

Citations

261 A.D.2d 455 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
687 N.Y.S.2d 294

Citing Cases

Sternheim v. Triborough Bridge and Tunnel

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in directing…