From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Minter v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jan 3, 2022
No. 3629-20 (U.S.T.C. Jan. 3, 2022)

Opinion

3629-20

01-03-2022

Willie Lee Minter, Jr. & Teresa Mui Morales Minter Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent


ORDER

Maurice B. Foley, Chief Judge

On February 25, 2021, the Court entered the parties' stipulated decision. On December 15, 2021, respondent filed a motion to correct clerical order, requesting that an inadvertent clerical error in that decision concerning one of the tax years at issue in this case be corrected. Respondent states that petitioners have no objection to the granting of his motion.

We may correct a clerical error in a final decision by order. See Seven W. Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner, 723 F.3d 857, 861-862 (7th Cir. 2013), vacating and remanding, 136 T.C. 539 (2011); Michaels v. Commissioner, 144 F.3d 495 (7th Cir. 1998) aff'g T.C. Memo. 1995-294.

Accordingly, and for cause, it is

ORDERED that respondent's motion to correct clerical order is recharacterized as a motion to correct clerical error. It is further

ORDERED that respondent's above-referenced motion is granted and the Decision entered February 25, 2021, is amended in that the reference in the ordered and decided paragraph therein to tax year "2020" is corrected to be to tax year "2018". It is further

ORDERED that, in all other respects, the Decision entered February 25, 2021, remains in full force and effect.


Summaries of

Minter v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jan 3, 2022
No. 3629-20 (U.S.T.C. Jan. 3, 2022)
Case details for

Minter v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Willie Lee Minter, Jr. & Teresa Mui Morales Minter Petitioners v…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Jan 3, 2022

Citations

No. 3629-20 (U.S.T.C. Jan. 3, 2022)