From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Minter v. Clarke

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 24, 2023
No. 22-7121 (4th Cir. Feb. 24, 2023)

Opinion

22-7121

02-24-2023

TROY X. MINTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of VA D.O.C.; DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Operations; JAMES M. SISK; MONTGOMERY TUCKER; RON ANGELONE; ADRIANNE BENNETT, Defendants-Appellees.

Troy Xavier Minter, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: February 21, 2023

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:19-cv-00660-AWA-RJK)

Troy Xavier Minter, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM.

Troy X. Minter appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Minter v. Clarke, No. 2:19-cv-00660-AWA-RJK (E.D. Va. Sept. 12, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Minter v. Clarke

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 24, 2023
No. 22-7121 (4th Cir. Feb. 24, 2023)
Case details for

Minter v. Clarke

Case Details

Full title:TROY X. MINTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of VA…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Feb 24, 2023

Citations

No. 22-7121 (4th Cir. Feb. 24, 2023)