From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Minott v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Oct 9, 1998
718 So. 2d 381 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 97-2957

October 9, 1998

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County, Mark J. Hill, Judge.

Charles A. Minott, Clermont, pro se.

Bradley R. Bischoff, General Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellee Florida Parole Commission.

No Appearance for Appellee, State of Florida.


The Florida Parole Commission concedes that the trial court's order denying habeas corpus should be vacated in order to give the petitioner, Charles A. Minott, an opportunity to serve a reply to the Commission's response. Bard v. Wolson, 687 So.2d 254 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (where response does not contain mere denial but sets forth matters in the nature of affirmative defenses or avoidances, appellant should have 20 days to serve a reply). We vacate the order denying the writ and instruct the trial court on remand to allow Minott twenty days to file a reply to the Commission's response, before granting or denying the writ.

ORDER VACATED; REMANDED.

W. SHARP, PETERSON and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Minott v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Oct 9, 1998
718 So. 2d 381 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Minott v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES A. MINOTT, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, et al., Appellees

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Oct 9, 1998

Citations

718 So. 2d 381 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

Wigfals v. McDonough

As the Florida Parole Commission concedes in this certiorari proceeding, the circuit court erred in denying…