Opinion
November 5, 1990
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Krausman, J.).
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with one bill of costs.
The Supreme Court properly determined that the appellant's motion, denominated as one to vacate an order on the ground of excusable default, was actually one for reargument of its prior motion for the same relief (see, Foley v. Roche, 68 A.D.2d 558). Since no appeal lies from the denial of a motion to reargue, the appeal is dismissed (see, McKay v. H.I.P of Greater N.Y., 163 A.D.2d 280; Anchor Sav. Bank v. Alpha Developers, 143 A.D.2d 711). Brown, J.P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.