From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Minor v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jun 24, 1976
228 S.E.2d 33 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976)

Opinion

52335.

SUBMITTED MAY 24, 1976.

DECIDED JUNE 24, 1976.

Burglary. Dougherty Superior Court. Before Judge Kelley.

Watson, Spence, Lowe Chambless, E. Dunn Stapleton, for appellant.

William S. Lee, District Attorney, Loring A. Gray, Jr., Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.


B. L. Minor appeals his conviction of burglary of a residence.

1. Minor contends that the jury's verdict was contrary to the weight of the evidence. The weight of the evidence "is addressed to the trial court alone, not an appellate court ... Even where an appellant proceeds directly by notice of appeal rather than by motion for new trial, the appellate courts undertake only to determine the sufficiency of the evidence, not to weigh it." Ridley v. State, 236 Ga. 147, 149 ( 223 S.E.2d 131). The evidence here was amply sufficient to support the verdict.

2. There was no error in permitting a detective, the nominal prosecutor in the case, to testify after he had remained in the courtroom during testimony of other state witnesses. This practice is "almost universal." Sparks v. State, 121 Ga. App. 115, 117 ( 173 S.E.2d 239); Tift v. State, 133 Ga. App. 455 (1) ( 211 S.E.2d 409).

Judgment affirmed. Deen, P. J., and Quillian, J., concur.


SUBMITTED MAY 24, 1976 — DECIDED JUNE 24, 1976.


Summaries of

Minor v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jun 24, 1976
228 S.E.2d 33 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976)
Case details for

Minor v. State

Case Details

Full title:MINOR v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jun 24, 1976

Citations

228 S.E.2d 33 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976)
228 S.E.2d 33

Citing Cases

Sherrell v. State

1. Sherrell contends that the weight of the evidence was contrary to the verdict of guilty. This issue is…

Rizk v. Tucker Coal & Brick Co.

The omission is not significant, however, since the Court of Appeals lacks jurisdiction to review the weight…