finding that collateral estoppel should not be applied in a federal civil rights case against defendant officers, because the officers were not parties to the state court proceedings and did not have a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in question
Summary of this case from McCoy v. HernandezNo. 96-914.
February 18, 1997.
C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 94 F. 3d 1103.
finding that collateral estoppel should not be applied in a federal civil rights case against defendant officers, because the officers were not parties to the state court proceedings and did not have a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in question
Summary of this case from McCoy v. HernandezFull title:MINOR v. PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES, INC., ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Feb 18, 1997
There must be a strong basis in the evidence supporting the existence of a compelling interest. Builders…
Pallesi v. ColvinEmbrey v. Bowen, 849 F.2d 418, 422 (9th Cir. 1988). Questions of credibility and resolution of conflicts in…