From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Minor v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA BEAUFORT DIVISION
Mar 12, 2018
C/A No. 9:17-1087-TMC (D.S.C. Mar. 12, 2018)

Opinion

C/A No. 9:17-1087-TMC

03-12-2018

Peyton Minor, Plaintiff, v. Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

Plaintiff Peyton Minor, proceeding pro se, brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") denying his claim for disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act. (ECF No. 1). This matter is before the court for review of the Report and Recommendation ("Report") of the United States Magistrate Judge, made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Civil Rule 73.02(B)(2)(a), D.S.C. (ECF No. 29). In his Report, the magistrate judge recommends that the Commissioner's decision be reversed and remanded, pursuant to sentence four of § 405(g), for further administrative proceedings. Id. at 15. On February 23, 2018, the Commissioner filed a notice of her intent not to file objections to the Report. (ECF No. 31). Plaintiff has not filed any objections to the Report, and the time to do so has now run.

The Report has no presumptive weight and the responsibility to make a final determination in this matter remains with this court. See Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270-71 (1976). In the absence of objections, this court is not required to provide an explanation for adopting the Report. See Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983). Rather, "in the absence of a timely filed objection, a district court need not conduct a de novo review, but instead must only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation." Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 advisory committee's note).

After a thorough and careful review of the record, the court adopts the Report of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 29) which is incorporated herein by reference. The Commissioner's final decision is REVERSED and REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the Report.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Timothy M. Cain

United States District Judge March 12, 2018
Anderson, South Carolina


Summaries of

Minor v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA BEAUFORT DIVISION
Mar 12, 2018
C/A No. 9:17-1087-TMC (D.S.C. Mar. 12, 2018)
Case details for

Minor v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:Peyton Minor, Plaintiff, v. Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA BEAUFORT DIVISION

Date published: Mar 12, 2018

Citations

C/A No. 9:17-1087-TMC (D.S.C. Mar. 12, 2018)

Citing Cases

Street v. Berryhill

In other words, "Mascio held that the ability to perform simple work is not the same as having the ability to…

Carroll v. Berryhill

In other words, what is missing is an explanation of how the ALJ's RFC determination takes into account…