Opinion
3:22-ms-00006-CLB
11-14-2022
ATUL MINOCHA, Petitioner, v. AUTO COMPANY XXV, INC., d/b/a/ MERCEDES-BENZ OF RENO, Respondent.
Martin A. Little, Jonathan W. Fountain, Alexander Villamar, Attorneys for Respondent Auto Company XXV, Inc. d/b/a/ Mercedes-Benz of Reno Whitney Craig Wilcher, Attorney for Petitioner Atul Minocha
Martin A. Little, Jonathan W. Fountain, Alexander Villamar, Attorneys for Respondent Auto Company XXV, Inc. d/b/a/ Mercedes-Benz of Reno
Whitney Craig Wilcher, Attorney for Petitioner Atul Minocha
ORDER GRANTING FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (Second Request)
Pursuant to Rule 6(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and District of Nevada Local Rules IA 6-1 and 7-1(a), Petitioner Atul Minocha (“Petitioner” or “Minocha”) and Respondent Auto Company XXV, Inc. d/b/a/ Mercedes-Benz of Reno (“Respondent” or “MB Reno”) hereby agree and stipulate that Respondent shall have up to and through November 30, 2022 to file and serve its opposition to the Motion.
The parties submit that good cause for the requested extension exists because: (a) prior to October 24, 2022, Respondent had not been served with the Motion; (b) Respondent recently retained counsel; (c) to varying degrees, the parties and their respective counsel will be unavailable due to the Thanksgiving holiday between November 23 through November 27; (d) Petitioner and third party automobile manufacturer Mercedes-Benz, USA, LLC, are actively engaged in discussions to settle the underlying civil action that gave rise to this subpoena enforcement action; and (e) if the underlying action in which Petitioner issued the subpoena is resolved by way of settlement, Petitioner's present motion in this case to enforce the subpoena will become moot.
This is the second stipulation seeking an extension of time for Respondent to file and serve an opposition to the Motion.
Dated: this 14th day of November 2022.
IT IS SO AGREED AND STIPULATED:
HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC
WHITNEY CRAIG WILCHER
IT IS SO ORDERED: