From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Minniecheske v. Dannhoff

Supreme Court of the United States
Oct 6, 2008
555 U.S. 803 (2008)

Opinion

No. 08–5296.

2008-10-6

Donald J. MINNIECHESKE, petitioner, v. Allyn DANNHOFF, et al.


Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) ( per curiam). Justice STEVENS dissents. See id., at 4, 113 S.Ct. 397, and cases cited therein.


Summaries of

Minniecheske v. Dannhoff

Supreme Court of the United States
Oct 6, 2008
555 U.S. 803 (2008)
Case details for

Minniecheske v. Dannhoff

Case Details

Full title:Donald J. MINNIECHESKE, petitioner, v. Allyn DANNHOFF, et al.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Oct 6, 2008

Citations

555 U.S. 803 (2008)
129 S. Ct. 242
172 L. Ed. 2d 9
77 U.S.L.W. 3208