From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Minnick v. Davis

United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division
Sep 8, 2005
Cause No. 3:99-CV-157 RM (N.D. Ind. Sep. 8, 2005)

Opinion

Cause No. 3:99-CV-157 RM.

September 8, 2005


OPINION AND ORDER DEATH PENALTY CASE


The parties, by counsel, filed an agreed motion to alter or amend judgment pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 59 in which they correctly note that it was the petitioner's sentence and not his conviction which was vacated by the state court. Due to a scriveners error, this court incorrectly used the word conviction in its order of September 1, 2005 when it should have use the word sentence. Though the court misstated the facts in that order, the parties prior briefing accurately presented the facts to the court. Based on his sentence having been vacated, this court found that it lacked jurisdiction.

For the foregoing reasons, the court:

(1) GRANTS the motion (docket # 173);

(2) AMENDS the order of September 1, 2005 (docket # 172); and

(3) DIRECTS the clerk to issue judgment consistent with that amended order.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Minnick v. Davis

United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division
Sep 8, 2005
Cause No. 3:99-CV-157 RM (N.D. Ind. Sep. 8, 2005)
Case details for

Minnick v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM A. MINNICK, by THOMAS ANTHONY DURKIN, His Guardian ad Litem…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division

Date published: Sep 8, 2005

Citations

Cause No. 3:99-CV-157 RM (N.D. Ind. Sep. 8, 2005)