From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Minnick v. Davis

United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division
Sep 1, 2005
Cause No. 3:99-CV-157 RM DEATH PENALTY CASE (N.D. Ind. Sep. 1, 2005)

Opinion

Cause No. 3:99-CV-157 RM DEATH PENALTY CASE.

September 1, 2005


OPINION AND ORDER


In response to this court's order directing the parties to show cause why this court continues to have jurisdiction, the respondent requests that the case be dismissed and the petitioner requests that it remain open until after he is found competent and resentenced by the state trial court. Neither have presented any basis for this court's continued jurisdiction. Based on the reasoning behind the disposition of the appeal from Ben-Yisrayl v. Davis, 245 F.Supp.2d 960 (N.D. Ind. 2002) (unpublished appellate decision reported at 114 Fed. Appx. 760), this court no longer has jurisdiction over this case because the conviction on which this habeas petition was directed has been vacated by the state trial court. See also Maharaj v. Sec'y for the Dep't of Corr., 304 F.3d 1345 (11th Cir. 2002) and Walker v. Crosby, 341 F.3d 1240, 1246 (11th Cir. 2003).

For the foregoing reasons, this case is DISMISSED.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Minnick v. Davis

United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division
Sep 1, 2005
Cause No. 3:99-CV-157 RM DEATH PENALTY CASE (N.D. Ind. Sep. 1, 2005)
Case details for

Minnick v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM A. MINNICK, by THOMAS ANTHONY DURKIN, His Guardian ad Litem…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division

Date published: Sep 1, 2005

Citations

Cause No. 3:99-CV-157 RM DEATH PENALTY CASE (N.D. Ind. Sep. 1, 2005)