On appeal from an eviction judgment, we determine whether the evidence sustains the findings of fact and whether the findings support the legal conclusions. Minneapolis Pub. Hous. Auth. v. Greene, 463 N.W.2d 558, 560 (Minn.App. 1990). We "review the district court's legal conclusions de novo" and "uphold the district court's factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous."
On appeal from an eviction judgment, we determine whether the evidence sustains the findings of fact and whether the findings support the legal conclusions. Minneapolis Pub. Hous. Auth. v. Greene, 463 N.W.2d 558, 560 (Minn. App. 1990). "We review the district court's factual findings for clear error."
On appeal from an eviction judgment, we determine whether the evidence sustains the findings of fact and whether the findings support the legal conclusions. Minneapolis Pub. Hous. Auth. v. Greene, 463 N.W.2d 558, 560 (Minn. App. 1990). We will not set aside findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous and we defer to the district court's credibility determinations.
On appeal from an eviction judgment, we determine whether the evidence sustains the findings of fact and whether the findings support the legal conclusions. Minneapolis Pub. Hous. Auth. v. Greene, 463 N.W.2d 558, 560 (Minn. App. 1990). We will not set aside findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Minn. R. Civ. P. 52.01.
On appeal from a civil judgment, we consider whether the evidence sustains the findings and whether the findings support the conclusions. Minneapolis Pub. Hous. Auth. v. Greene, 463 N.W.2d 558, 560 (Minn. App. 1990). When material facts are not in dispute, we review the district court's application of the law de novo.
On appeal from an unlawful detainer action, we consider whether the evidence supports the findings and whether the findings sustain the conclusions. Minneapolis Pub. Hous. Auth. v. Greene, 463 N.W.2d 558, 560 (Minn.App. 1990). We will not set aside findings of fact unless we find them to be clearly erroneous. Minn. R. Civ. P. 52.01.
On appeal, appellant contends that he has riparian rights and that respondents do not have an easement across his RV parcel. "The standard of review on appeal from a civil judgment is whether the evidence sustains the findings and whether the findings support the conclusions." Minneapolis Pub. Hous. Auth. v. Greene, 463 N.W.2d 558, 560 (Minn.App. 1990). This court will not reverse the district court merely because we view the evidence differently.
"The standard of review on appeal from a civil judgment is whether the evidence sustains the findings and whether the findings support the conclusions." Minneapolis Pub. Hous. Auth. v. Greene, 463 N.W.2d 558, 560 (Minn.App. 1990). "Findings of fact, whether based on oral or documentary evidence, shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and due regard shall be given to the opportunity of the trial court to judge the credibility of the witnesses."
2. "The standard of review on appeal from a civil judgment is whether the evidence sustains the findings and whether the findings support the conclusions." Minneapolis Pub. Hous. Auth. v. Greene, 463 N.W.2d 558, 560 (Minn.App. 1990) (citation omitted). Findings of fact shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous.
The standard of review for judgments of restitution is whether the evidence is sufficient to support the trial court's conclusions. Minneapolis Pub. Hous. Auth. v. Greene, 463 N.W.2d 558, 560 (Minn.App. 1990). Respondent presented witnesses at trial who testified that appellants moved the rabbit pen onto adjacent non-Park property, but then frequently brought the rabbits back to their residence and allowed them to run loose on Park property.