From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mining Co. v. Mining Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1888
8 S.E. 361 (N.C. 1888)

Opinion

(September Term, 1888.)


FROM DAVIDSON SUPERIOR COURT.


This repeal has been retained for several terms under an adversari, while the subject matter has been fully considered in the opinion heretofore delivered in the decision of the defendant's appeal. Silver Valley Co. v. Baltimore Co., 99 N.C. 445. After due consideration, and in view of what is there said, our conclusion is that no error is disclosed in the ruling from which the present appeal is taken, and therefore we affirm the judgment.

Affirmed.

Cited: Lanier v. Pullman Co., 180 N.C. 410


Summaries of

Mining Co. v. Mining Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1888
8 S.E. 361 (N.C. 1888)
Case details for

Mining Co. v. Mining Co.

Case Details

Full title:SILVER VALLEY MINING COMPANY v. THE BALTIMORE MINING COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Sep 1, 1888

Citations

8 S.E. 361 (N.C. 1888)
101 N.C. 679