From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mining Co. v. Hunter

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 26, 1935
199 N.E. 184 (Ohio 1935)

Opinion

No. 25450

Decided December 26, 1935.

Appeal and error — Court of Appeals — Jurisdiction — Final order — Motions for directed verdict and for final judgment overruled — Motion for new trial sustained by Common Pleas Court.

ERROR to the Court of Appeals of Athens county.

Messrs. Jones, Jones Erskine and Mr. H.C. Allread, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. M.D. Hughes and Messrs. Woolley Rowland, for defendant in error.


The original action was an appeal from an order of the Industrial Commission denying a death award.

The Court of Common Pleas overruled defendant's motions for a directed verdict and defendant's motion for final judgment, but, after a verdict was returned for plaintiff, sustained a motion by defendant for new trial.

The defendant prosecuted error to the Court of Appeals, which court sustained a motion to dismiss the petition in error upon the ground that no final order was entered in the Common Pleas Court from which error proceedings could be prosecuted.

On consideration whereof it is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the Court of Appeals be, and the same hereby is, reversed for error in sustaining the motion to dismiss the petition in error ( Davis v. Turner, 69 Ohio St. 101, 68 N.E. 819, and Jacob Laub Baking Co. v. Middleton, 118 Ohio St. 106, 160 N.E. 629), and this cause is remanded to the Court of Appeals to determine whether the original defendant was entitled to a directed verdict upon a consideration of the evidence submitted in the Common Pleas Court.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

WEYGANDT, C.J., STEPHENSON, JONES, MATTHIAS, DAY and ZIMMERMAN, JJ., concur.

WILLIAMS, J., dissents.


Summaries of

Mining Co. v. Hunter

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 26, 1935
199 N.E. 184 (Ohio 1935)
Case details for

Mining Co. v. Hunter

Case Details

Full title:THE HOCKING VALLEY MINING CO. v. HUNTER

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Dec 26, 1935

Citations

199 N.E. 184 (Ohio 1935)
199 N.E. 184

Citing Cases

Michigan-Ohio-Indiana Coal Assn. v. Nigh

4. The fact that a party elected to and was successful in obtaining a new trial does not deprive him of the…

Massachusetts Mutual Life Ins. v. Hauk

This court is of opinion that plaintiff cannot be deprived of its right to a decision upon both of these…