From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mingo v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 10, 1990
394 S.E.2d 104 (Ga. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

A90A0267.

DECIDED APRIL 10, 1990. REHEARING DENIED APRIL 24, 1990.

Rape, etc. Dougherty Superior Court. Before Judge Lott, Senior Judge.

Landau, Davis Farkas, Thomas G. Ledford, for appellant.

Britt R. Priddy, District Attorney, John L. Tracy, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.


Defendant appeals his convictions of kidnapping, OCGA § 16-5-40; robbery, OCGA § 16-8-40; and rape, OCGA § 16-6-1.

1. Defendant contends the trial court erred in refusing to admit, for purposes of impeachment, certified copies of the victim's guilty pleas to charges of issuing bad checks.

After the State rested, defendant proposed to recall the victim to question her pursuant to offering the copies of guilty pleas. Defendant stated they would show the victim was guilty of offenses involving moral turpitude so as to impeach her testimony and impugn her credibility. The trial court ruled the evidence improper for impeachment purposes and that the offenses did not involve moral turpitude.

Defendant did not request that the witness be called for purposes of further cross-examination. He had made no attempt to raise the issue when the witness was cross-examination. In effect, he was recalling the witness as his own for purposes of impeachment. There being no showing of entrapment, this is not permitted. OCGA § 24-9-81; Eberhart v. State, 121 Ga. App. 663, 664 (3) ( 175 S.E.2d 73) (1970). It was not an abuse of discretion to refuse permission to recall the State's witness and introduce evidence impeaching her.

2. Defendant complains of the sufficiency of evidence to sustain his conviction. The matters he raises concerning credibility of witnesses are for the jury, under proper instructions from the trial court, and not for the appellate court. Roberts v. State, 259 Ga. 441, 442 (1) ( 383 S.E.2d 872) (1989). He did not establish his alibi or the victim's non-credibility as a matter of law.

A rational trier of fact was authorized to find defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the crimes charged.

Judgment affirmed. Deen, P. J., and Pope, J., concur.

DECIDED APRIL 10, 1990 — REHEARING DENIED APRIL 24, 1990.


Summaries of

Mingo v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 10, 1990
394 S.E.2d 104 (Ga. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Mingo v. State

Case Details

Full title:MINGO v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Apr 10, 1990

Citations

394 S.E.2d 104 (Ga. Ct. App. 1990)
394 S.E.2d 104

Citing Cases

Carruth v. Brown

On redirect, Carruth elaborated about the circumstances of writing the bad checks (marital difficulties…