From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ming Huei Lin v. Vaughn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Jan 11, 2013
No. CV 12-851 LH/WDS (D.N.M. Jan. 11, 2013)

Opinion

No. CV 12-851 LH/WDS

01-11-2013

MING HUEI LIN, Petitioner, v. LEE VAUGHN, Respondent.


MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S PROPOSED

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION

Within fourteen (14) days after a party is served with a copy of these findings and recommendations, that party may, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1), file written objections to such findings and recommendations. A party must file any objections with the Clerk of the U.S. District Court within the fourteen-day period allowed if that party wants to have appellate review of the findings and recommendations. If no objections are filed, no appellate review will be allowed.

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Respondent's Motion to Dismiss Ming Heui Lin's Petition for Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2241. [Doc. No. 8] Having reviewed the Petition and the Motion to Dismiss, to which Petitioner has filed no opposition, and considering the record and the law, the Court recommends that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED as unopposed, and that the petition be dismissed with prejudice.

_________________

W. DANIEL SCHNEIDER

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Ming Huei Lin v. Vaughn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Jan 11, 2013
No. CV 12-851 LH/WDS (D.N.M. Jan. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Ming Huei Lin v. Vaughn

Case Details

Full title:MING HUEI LIN, Petitioner, v. LEE VAUGHN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: Jan 11, 2013

Citations

No. CV 12-851 LH/WDS (D.N.M. Jan. 11, 2013)