From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mines v. Piazza

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 16, 2009
NO. 09-1102 (M.D. Pa. Sep. 16, 2009)

Opinion

NO. 09-1102.

September 16, 2009


MEMORANDUM ORDER


Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Donald Mines's Motion for Reconsideration of this Court's July 16, 2009 Order (Doc. 14) denying the motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Temporary Injunction (Doc. 11.) Plaintiff's only argument is that this Court should consider the economic hardship caused when fines are deducted from his wages. (Doc. 18, pg. 1) Even if Plaintiff's claims that these deductions are inappropriate are true, this type of economic loss is not the type of irreparable injury which is required for a Temporary Restraining Order. See Frank's GMC Truck Center Inc. v. General Motors Corp., 847 F. 2d 100, 102 (3d Cir. 1988) ("the availability of monetary damages belies a claim of irreparable injury.").

NOW, this 16 th day of September, 2009, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Reconsideration for Temporary Restraining Order is DENIED.


Summaries of

Mines v. Piazza

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 16, 2009
NO. 09-1102 (M.D. Pa. Sep. 16, 2009)
Case details for

Mines v. Piazza

Case Details

Full title:DONALD MINES, Plaintiffs, v. J. PIAZZA, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 16, 2009

Citations

NO. 09-1102 (M.D. Pa. Sep. 16, 2009)