From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mineo v. Taefi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 7, 2001
280 A.D.2d 971 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

February 7, 2001.

Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Fallon, J. — Summary Judgment.

Pigott, Jr., P. J., Pine, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Lawton, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed with costs.

Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint in this medical malpractice action. We agree with plaintiff that defendant's motion papers fail to address her allegation that defendant failed to diagnose postpartum "retained products of conception" and to treat that condition, and thus defendant failed to meet his initial burden of establishing his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law ( see generally, Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 562). Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant met his initial burden, we conclude that plaintiff raised an issue of fact whether she complained of bleeding, cramps and fever on her first follow-up appointment with defendant. In addition, plaintiffs expert raised an issue of fact whether defendant departed from acceptable standards of medical care by failing to diagnose, treat or make a record of plaintiffs complaints ( see, Bennett v. Knipfing, 262 A.D.2d 260).


Summaries of

Mineo v. Taefi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 7, 2001
280 A.D.2d 971 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Mineo v. Taefi

Case Details

Full title:MEGHAN P. MINEO, RESPONDENT, v. PARVIZ TAEFI, M.D., APPELLANT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 7, 2001

Citations

280 A.D.2d 971 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
721 N.Y.S.2d 217

Citing Cases

Brongo v. Town of Greece

We agree with plaintiffs, however, that the court erred in granting the motion with respect to the Labor Law…