From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mind Med. (MindMed) v. Freeman

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 2, 2023
2:23-cv-01354-MMD-EJY (D. Nev. Oct. 2, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-01354-MMD-EJY

10-02-2023

MIND MEDICINE (MINDMED) INC., a British Columbia Corporation, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT FREEMAN, an individual, and FCM MM HOLDINGS, LLC, a Wyoming Limited Liability Company, Defendants.

Robert J. Cassity Erica C. Medley Holland & Hart LLP Attorneys for FCM MM Holdings, LLC Holdings, LLC Dickinson Wright PLLC Justin J. Bustos Attorneys for Plaintiff


Robert J. Cassity

Erica C. Medley

Holland & Hart LLP

Attorneys for FCM MM Holdings, LLC Holdings, LLC

Dickinson Wright PLLC

Justin J. Bustos

Attorneys for Plaintiff

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT FCM MM HOLDINGS, LLC TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS [ECF NO. 13]

(FIRST REQUEST)

Defendant FCM MM Holdings, LLC (“FCM” or “Defendant”), and Plaintiff Mind Medicine (MindMed) Inc., (“MindMed”) by and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate and agree as follows:

1. On September 6, 2023, FCM filed its sealed Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 13).

2. On September 13, 2023 the parties stipulated to an extension of time for MindMed to file its response to the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 17).

3. On September 27, 2023, MindMed filed its Opposition to FCM's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 33).

4. FCM's Reply in support of its Motion to Dismiss is currently due on Wednesday, October 4, 2023.

5. In order to accommodate scheduling conflicts of FCM's counsel and to provide sufficient time for FCM's counsel to review the Opposition and prepare its reply, the parties have agreed to an extension of the deadline for FCM to file its Reply in Support of its Motion to Dismiss.

6. The parties therefore stipulate that FCM may have until October 13, 2023, to file its Reply in support of its Motion to Dismiss.

7. This is the first request for an extension of time for FCM to file a Reply in support of its Motion to Dismiss. This stipulation is made in good faith and to allow FCM time to fully and professionally brief the issues raised in the Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss and is not made for purposes of delay.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Mind Med. (MindMed) v. Freeman

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 2, 2023
2:23-cv-01354-MMD-EJY (D. Nev. Oct. 2, 2023)
Case details for

Mind Med. (MindMed) v. Freeman

Case Details

Full title:MIND MEDICINE (MINDMED) INC., a British Columbia Corporation, Plaintiff…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 2, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-01354-MMD-EJY (D. Nev. Oct. 2, 2023)