From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MINCY v. KLEM

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 14, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07-CV-0790 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 14, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07-CV-0790.

June 14, 2011


ORDER


AND NOW, this 14th day of June, 2011, upon consideration of plaintiff's motion to compel answers to interrogatories (Doc. 94), it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The motion (Doc. 94) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
2. The motion is GRANTED as follows:
a. Defendants shall provide to plaintiff, on or before June 27, 2011, signed copies of all answers to interrogatories. FED. R. CIV. P. 33(b)(5).
b. Defendant Kmieciak shall provide to plaintiff, on or before June 27, 2011, full and complete responses to interrogatories 13 and 14.
3. The motion is DENIED as follows:
a. Defendant Chmielewski's responses to interrogatories 4 and 24, and Defendant Gavin's responses to interrogatories 18-20, are DEEMED adequate. No further responses are warranted.
b. Because plaintiff failed to attach copies of the interrogatories of defendants Kershner and Klem, the Court is unable to assess the adequacy of their responses.


Summaries of

MINCY v. KLEM

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 14, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07-CV-0790 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 14, 2011)
Case details for

MINCY v. KLEM

Case Details

Full title:HILTON KARRIEM MINCY, Plaintiff, v. EDWARD KLEM, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 14, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07-CV-0790 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 14, 2011)