From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MINCY v. KLEM

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 16, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08-CV-0066 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 16, 2010)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08-CV-0066.

February 16, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this day of 16th February, 2010, upon consideration of plaintiff's motion to compel (Doc. 39) defendants "to give accurate answers to request for admissions," and it appearing from defendants' brief in opposition (Doc. 44) and "defendants' supplemental and amended responses to plaintiff's request for admissions" (Doc. 44-3) annexed to defendants' brief, that defendants have cured the defects of which plaintiff complained in his motion, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to compel (Doc. 39) is DENIED.


Summaries of

MINCY v. KLEM

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 16, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08-CV-0066 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 16, 2010)
Case details for

MINCY v. KLEM

Case Details

Full title:HILTON KARRIEM MINCY, Plaintiff v. SUPERINTENDENT EDWARD KLEM, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 16, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08-CV-0066 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 16, 2010)