From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mincy v. Klem

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 26, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07-CV-0790 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 26, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07-CV-0790

01-26-2012

HILTON KARRIEM MINCY, Plaintiff, v. EDWARD KLEM, et al., Defendants


(Judge Conner)


ORDER

AND NOW, this 26th day of January, 2012, upon consideration of various motions filed by plaintiff (Docs. 181, 182, 184) it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (Doc. 181) is deemed WITHDRAWN for failure to file a brief in support of the motion. See L.R. 7.5.
2. Plaintiff's motion (Doc. 182) to strike the original complaint in this action (Doc. 1) filed on April 30, 2007, and replace it with an amended complaint filed in Civil Action 07-CV-0340 on May 15, 2007 (Doc. 14), is DENIED as the present action is governed by the amended complaint docketed on September 10, 2009 (Doc. 27), and replacing the original complaint with an amended complaint that pre-dates the governing amended complaint serves no purpose in this litigation.
3. Plaintiff's motion to expedite (Doc. 184) the ruling on pending discovery motions (Docs. 140, 151) is DENIED as moot by the issuance of this Court's November 30, 2011 Order (Doc. 179) addressing those motions.

______________________

CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Mincy v. Klem

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 26, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07-CV-0790 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 26, 2012)
Case details for

Mincy v. Klem

Case Details

Full title:HILTON KARRIEM MINCY, Plaintiff, v. EDWARD KLEM, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jan 26, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07-CV-0790 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 26, 2012)