From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mincy v. Klem

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 30, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07-CV-0790 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 30, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07-CV-0790

01-30-2012

HILTON KARRIEM MINCY, Plaintiff, v. EDWARD KLEM, et al., Defendants


(Judge Conner)


ORDER

AND NOW, this 30th day of January, 2012, upon consideration of defendants' motion (Doc. 171) to strike plaintiff's counter-statement of material facts and brief in opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment on the grounds that plaintiff failed to attach referenced appendices and discovery responses to his statement of material facts, and upon further consideration of plaintiff's motion (Doc. 173) to strike defendants' statement of material facts based upon defendants' failure to include supporting documentation with the statement, and it appearing that the documents supporting each parties' statements of material facts are attached as exhibits to their briefs (Docs. 159, 167), as opposed to their statements of material facts, it is hereby ORDERED that the motions (Docs. 171, 173) are DENIED.

____________

CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Mincy v. Klem

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 30, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07-CV-0790 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 30, 2012)
Case details for

Mincy v. Klem

Case Details

Full title:HILTON KARRIEM MINCY, Plaintiff, v. EDWARD KLEM, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jan 30, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07-CV-0790 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 30, 2012)