From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mincy v. Chmielewski

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 25, 2005
Civil Action No. 1:05-CV-0292 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 25, 2005)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 1:05-CV-0292.

October 25, 2005


ORDER


AND NOW, this 25th day of October, 2006, upon consideration of plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (Doc. 116) of the order of court denying the motion for consolidation/joinder of trials (Doc. 113), and it appearing that plaintiff merely reargues matters addressed by the court and disposed of in the previous order (Doc. 113), see Waye v. First Citizen's Nat'l Bank, 846 F. Supp. 310, 314 (M.D. Pa.) ("A motion for reconsideration is not to be used to reargue matters already argued and disposed of."), aff'd, 31 F.3d 1174 (3d Cir. 1994), it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (Doc. 116) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Mincy v. Chmielewski

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 25, 2005
Civil Action No. 1:05-CV-0292 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 25, 2005)
Case details for

Mincy v. Chmielewski

Case Details

Full title:HILTON MINCY, Plaintiff, v. KENNETH G. CHMIELEWSKI, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 25, 2005

Citations

Civil Action No. 1:05-CV-0292 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 25, 2005)