From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Minasian v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Mar 1, 2012
79 So. 3d 112 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 4D10–4810.

2012-03-1

Michael SANTOS a/k/a Michael Minasian, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Stephen A. Rapp, Judge; L.T. Case No. 1992CF015503AXX.Michael Santos a/k/a Michael Minasian, Lake City, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.


Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Stephen A. Rapp, Judge; L.T. Case No. 1992CF015503AXX.Michael Santos a/k/a Michael Minasian, Lake City, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm with prejudice the summary denial of appellant's untimely postconviction motion. The alleged “newly discovered evidence,” that jury selection was not transcribed for the direct appeal in 1994, could have been discovered with due diligence within the two-year time limit. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b)(1).

Affirmed.

WARNER, POLEN and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Minasian v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Mar 1, 2012
79 So. 3d 112 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Minasian v. State

Case Details

Full title:Michael SANTOS a/k/a Michael Minasian, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Mar 1, 2012

Citations

79 So. 3d 112 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)