Opinion
Civil Action 23-3111
05-23-2024
MIN HUI LIN, on his own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated v. LEE'S HOUSE RESTAURANT, INC., SEN LIN, BAIQUN LIN
ORDER
MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, U.S.D.J.
AND NOW, this 23rd day of May, 2024, it is ORDERED, for the reasons stated in the foregoing memorandum, that Plaintiff's motion for conditional certification (ECF 20) is DENIED. In so denying, the Court notes that “denial at the conditional certification stage is not necessarily a final determination of whether the matter may proceed as a collective action,” as certification may be “revisited after discovery or efforts by the named plaintiff to re-define the contours of the proposed collective action.” Halle v. W. Penn Allegheny Health Sys. Inc., 842 F.3d 215, 224-225 (3d Cir. 2016); see also Symczyk v. Genesis HealthCare Corp., 656 F.3d 189, 193 (3d Cir. 2011), rev'd on other grounds, 569 U.S. 66 (2013); Symczyk v. Genesis Healthcare Corp., 2010 WL 2038676, at *1 (E.D. Pa. May 19, 2010) (Baylson, J.), rev'd on other grounds, 656 F.3d 189 (3d Cir. 2011), rev'd on other grounds, 569 U.S. 66 (2013).