From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mimidis v. Papoulias

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1956
94 S.E.2d 367 (N.C. 1956)

Opinion

Filed 19 September, 1956.

Appeal and Error 49 — The findings of fact of the referee in a consent reference, approved by the trial court, are conclusive when supported by evidence.

APPEAL by defendant Papoulias from Froneberger, J., January Term, 1956, of BUNCOMBE.

I. C. Crawford and L. C. Stoker for plaintiff, appellee.

Irvin Monk and Ward Bennett for defendant Papoulias, appellant.


JOHNSON, J., not sitting.


This was a suit to settle the partnership between plaintiff and defendants, who had been doing business as Pack Square Hat Cleaners. Plaintiff alleged there was a balance due him by defendant Papoulias for the purchase of one-half interest in the business in the sum of $2,500, and that Papoulias was indebted to him on other items. Defendant Papoulias admitted he owed plaintiff $2,500 as alleged, but contended plaintiff was indebted to him on several matters growing out of their dealing.

There was a consent reference. The referee reported that defendant Papoulias owed plaintiff $2,500 balance on purchase of one-half interest in the partnership, but that the records were incomplete, inaccurate, and conflicting, and that it was impossible to determine the amount, if any, plaintiff owed Papoulias or defendant Papoulias owed plaintiff; that defendant Levas had been settled with in full and was not entitled to recover anything. Defendant Papoulias filed exceptions to the referee's report.

Judge Fountain overruled the exceptions and adopted the findings of the referee, but remanded the cause to the referee to further consider the evidence and determine if either plaintiff or defendant Papoulias was indebted to the other. The referee reported that he found defendant Papoulias was not indebted to the plaintiff and that plaintiff was not indebted to the defendant Papoulias. Defendant Papoulias filed exceptions to the referee's further report.

Judge Froneberger concluded that the findings by the referee in this supplemental report were correct, overruled the exceptions and approved and confirmed the report.

Defendant Papoulias appealed.


This was a consent reference. The findings and conclusions of the referee appear to be supported by evidence and these were adopted and approved by the court. Hence the judgment will be affirmed. Anderson v. McRae, 211 N.C. 197, 189 S.E. 639; Griffin v. Jones, 230 N.C. 612, 54 S.E.2d 920.

Affirmed.

JOHNSON, J., not sitting.


Summaries of

Mimidis v. Papoulias

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1956
94 S.E.2d 367 (N.C. 1956)
Case details for

Mimidis v. Papoulias

Case Details

Full title:JOHN MIMIDIS v. ANDREW H. PAPOULIAS AND SOCRATES A. LEVAS

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Sep 1, 1956

Citations

94 S.E.2d 367 (N.C. 1956)
94 S.E.2d 367