From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Milyakov v. JP Morgan Chase, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 21, 2011
No. C 11-02066 WHA (N.D. Cal. Nov. 21, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 11-02066 WHA

11-21-2011

EMIL P. MILYAKOV and MAGDALENA A. APOSTOLOVA, Plaintiffs, v. JP MORGAN CHASE, N.A., HSBC BANK USA, NA, CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE CO., PAUL FINANCIAL, LLC, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. (MERS), FOUNDATION CONVEYANCING, LLC, and DOES 1 through 100, Defendants.


ORDER STRIKING MOTION

TO DISMISS AND DENYING AS

MOOT MOTION TO SHORTEN

TIME

Pro se plaintiffs Emil Milyakov and Magdalena Apostolova have filed a motion to dismiss and a motion to shorten time for the motion to dismiss. Plaintiffs filed a motion to dismiss on November 17, 2011, and noticed it for hearing on December 1, 2011. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-2, "all motions must be filed, served and noticed in writing on the motion calendar of the assigned Judge for hearing not less than 35 days after service of the motion." Plaintiffs have failed to comply with Rule 7-2. Their motion to dismiss is hereby S TRICKEN.

Plaintiffs have also filed a motion to shorten time for the motion to dismiss pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 6-3, without submitting the required declaration. As plaintiffs' motion to dismiss has been stricken, the motion to shorten time is D ENIED AS M OOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Milyakov v. JP Morgan Chase, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 21, 2011
No. C 11-02066 WHA (N.D. Cal. Nov. 21, 2011)
Case details for

Milyakov v. JP Morgan Chase, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:EMIL P. MILYAKOV and MAGDALENA A. APOSTOLOVA, Plaintiffs, v. JP MORGAN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 21, 2011

Citations

No. C 11-02066 WHA (N.D. Cal. Nov. 21, 2011)