From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Milyakov v. JP Morgan Chase, NA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 16, 2011
No. C 11-02066 WHA (N.D. Cal. Oct. 16, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 11-02066 WHA

10-16-2011

EMIL P. MILYAKOV and MAGDALENA A. APOSTOLOVA, Plaintiffs, v. JP MORGAN CHASE, N.A., HSBC BANK USA, NA, CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE CO., PAUL FINANCIAL, LLC, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. (MERS), FOUNDATION CONVEYANCING, LLC, and DOES 1 through 100, Defendants.


ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR AN ORDER COMPELLING FURTHER

DISCOVERY RESPONSES FROM ALL DEFENDANTS

Pro se plaintiffs filed a motion for an order compelling further responses to discovery from all defendants. Pursuant to paragraph 25 of the Court's Supplemental Order, "requests for discovery relief must first be summarized in a letter no longer than three pages from the party seeking relief after having met and conferred." Plaintiffs make no representation that they met and conferred with defendants regarding the discovery dispute. Prior to seeking discovery relief from the Court, plaintiffs must comply with the requirements set forth in the Supplemental Order. Thus, plaintiffs' motion is hereby STRICKEN. The motion hearing is VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Milyakov v. JP Morgan Chase, NA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 16, 2011
No. C 11-02066 WHA (N.D. Cal. Oct. 16, 2011)
Case details for

Milyakov v. JP Morgan Chase, NA

Case Details

Full title:EMIL P. MILYAKOV and MAGDALENA A. APOSTOLOVA, Plaintiffs, v. JP MORGAN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 16, 2011

Citations

No. C 11-02066 WHA (N.D. Cal. Oct. 16, 2011)