From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Milwitt v. Ashcroft

United States District Court, N.D. California
Jul 9, 2008
No. 07-05078 CW (N.D. Cal. Jul. 9, 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-05078 CW.

July 9, 2008


ORDER


On June 18, 2008, the Court issued a Clerk's Notice Taking Motion Under Submission in which the Plaintiff was notified that his opposition to Defendants County of Alameda and Charles Plummer's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6), or Alternatively, Motion for More Definite Statement would be due July 3, 2008. Plaintiff was warned that failure to timely file an opposition may result in dismissal this case for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff has not filed an opposition to the motion.

On June 23, 2008, Federal Defendants John Ashcroft and Albert Gonzales filed a Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion for More Definite Statement. Plaintiff's opposition to the Federal Defendants' motion is due July 17, 2008. Accordingly

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Federal Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion for More Definite Statement will be decided on the papers, and the August 7, 2008, hearing is vacated. Plaintiff's written opposition to both Alameda County and Charles Plummer motion to dismiss and the Federal Defendants' motion to dismiss will be due July 17, 2008. Failure by Plaintiff to timely file an opposition to both motions will result in dismissal of this case for failure to prosecute.


Summaries of

Milwitt v. Ashcroft

United States District Court, N.D. California
Jul 9, 2008
No. 07-05078 CW (N.D. Cal. Jul. 9, 2008)
Case details for

Milwitt v. Ashcroft

Case Details

Full title:JOHN MILWITT, Plaintiff, v. JOHN ASHCROFT, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Jul 9, 2008

Citations

No. 07-05078 CW (N.D. Cal. Jul. 9, 2008)