From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Milton v. Trate

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 14, 2023
1:22-cv-00988-ADA-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2023)

Opinion

1:22-cv-00988-ADA-EPG (PC)

02-14-2023

KYLE DAVID MILTON, Plaintiff, v. B.M. TRATE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

(ECF NOS. 1, 11, 13)

Kyle David Milton (“Plaintiff) is incarcerated at Atwater U.S. Penitentiary and is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On January 3, 2023, the assigned Magistrate Judge entered findings and recommendations, recommending “that all claims and defendants be dismissed, except for Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims against defendants Trate, Dr. Paltenghi, and Dr. Grassely for deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs and Plaintiff's Fifth Amendment claims against defendants Trate, Dr. Paltenghi, and Dr. Grassely for violating his equal protection rights.” (ECF No. 13 at 2.)

Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections to the findings and recommendations. The deadline for filing objections has passed and Plaintiff has not filed objections or otherwise responded to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, 1. The findings and recommendations issued on January 3, 2023, (ECF No. 13), are adopted in full;

2. All claims and defendants are dismissed, except for Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims against defendants Trate, Dr. Paltenghi, and Dr. Grassely for deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs and Plaintiff's Fifth Amendment claims against defendants Trate, Dr. Paltenghi, and Dr. Grassely for violating his equal protection rights; and

3. The case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Milton v. Trate

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 14, 2023
1:22-cv-00988-ADA-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2023)
Case details for

Milton v. Trate

Case Details

Full title:KYLE DAVID MILTON, Plaintiff, v. B.M. TRATE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Feb 14, 2023

Citations

1:22-cv-00988-ADA-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2023)