Summary
In Milton, this Court issued a written order and supporting memorandum pursuant to Rule 84.16(b) affirming the trial court's dismissal of the breach of contract claims brought by a group of physicians against SSM. The supporting memorandum setting out the basis for our decision “ shall not constitute a formal opinion of the court, shall not be reported, and shall not be cited or otherwise used in any case before any court.” Rule 84.16(b) (emphasis added).
Summary of this case from Jennings v. Ssm Health Care St. LouisOpinion
No. ED92667.
September 29, 2009.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Tommy W. DePriest, Jr., Judge.
Larry A. Bagsby, St. Charles, MO, for Appellant.
Kathi L. Chestnut, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J. and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR. and PATRICIA L. COHEN, JJ.
ORDER
John A. Milton, M.D. ("Dr. Milton"), John Fuller, M.D. ("Dr. Fuller"), and Robert Mudd, M.D. ("Dr. Mudd") (collectively referred to as "Appellants") appeal from the judgment of the trial court dismissing their claims for breach of contract against SSM Health Care of St. Louis ("Respondent").
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).