From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Milton v. Roe

United States District Court, Central District of California
Apr 23, 2024
2:01-04090 CAS (ADS) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 23, 2024)

Opinion

2:01-04090 CAS (ADS)

04-23-2024

WILLIAM MILTON, Petitioner, v. ERNEST C. ROE, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

HONORABLE CHRISTINA A.SNYDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Motion for Relief from Final Judgment Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) (“Motion”) (Dkt. No. 56), the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 61), Petitioner's objections to the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 62), and all the records and files herein. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections were made. The Court overrules the objections and accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation is accepted (Dkt. No. 61);

2. The Motion is denied (Dkt. No. 56); and

3. The Certificate of Appealability is denied.


Summaries of

Milton v. Roe

United States District Court, Central District of California
Apr 23, 2024
2:01-04090 CAS (ADS) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 23, 2024)
Case details for

Milton v. Roe

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM MILTON, Petitioner, v. ERNEST C. ROE, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Apr 23, 2024

Citations

2:01-04090 CAS (ADS) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 23, 2024)