From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Milton v. Boles

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Nov 24, 2008
CASE NO.: 3:08cv286/LAC/MD (N.D. Fla. Nov. 24, 2008)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 3:08cv286/LAC/MD.

November 24, 2008


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated November 3, 2008. The plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Plaintiff's federal claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

3. Plaintiff's state law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to his refiling them in state court.

4. All pending motions are DENIED as Moot.

5. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED


Summaries of

Milton v. Boles

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Nov 24, 2008
CASE NO.: 3:08cv286/LAC/MD (N.D. Fla. Nov. 24, 2008)
Case details for

Milton v. Boles

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK M. MILTON, Plaintiff, v. W. JOEL BOLES, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Nov 24, 2008

Citations

CASE NO.: 3:08cv286/LAC/MD (N.D. Fla. Nov. 24, 2008)

Citing Cases

David v. United States

In Amesbury v. Kearney, 154 F. App'x 118, 119 (11th Cir. 2005), for instance, the Eleventh Circuit held that…

Brewer v. Pensacola Police Dep't

The Federal Tort Claims Act ("FTCA"), however, is not applicable in this case because none of the Defendants…