Opinion
Submitted October 8, 1999
December 2, 1999
In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Shapiro, J.), entered August 3, 1998, as, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the second cause of action alleging cruel and inhuman treatment.
Rubin, Cooper Burns, Rockville Centre, N.Y. (Leslie F. Burns of counsel), for appellant.
Moran Brodrick, Garden City, N.Y. (Leslie K. Rothkopf of counsel), for respondent.
MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., ANITA R. FLORIO, HOWARD MILLER, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.
DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The Supreme Court erred in restricting the proof at trial to the specific times and occurrences alleged in the complaint, and in refusing to permit evidence designed to show a general course of conduct by the defendant (see, Rusoff v. Rusoff, 20 A.D.2d 794 ;Rasmussen v. Rasmussen, 278 App. Div. 670). However, since there was no showing that the excluded evidence would have had a substantial influence upon the result of the trial, reversal is not warranted (see, CPLR 2002; Walker v. State of New York, 111 A.D.2d 164).
ALTMAN, J.P., FLORIO, H. MILLER, and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.